Tampilkan postingan dengan label ERP Solution. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label ERP Solution. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 23 Maret 2009

Accountability and Variability in Manufacturing - The ERP Solution

On-time delivery doesn't happen on it's own; rather, it's the result of considerable planning, production, and accounting in the manufacturing process. As well, improved service levels means more repetitive business coming from continuously satisfied customers. In other words, predictability and repeatability allow manufacturers to more accurately forecast the economic, material, manpower, and production yields that make a company grow strong and regarded well by others in the supply-chain and the marketplace.

Planning, production, and accounting in the manufacturing process are intentional, and their validity and repeatability are paramount for prosperous growth. To the degree that these variables can be controlled, a robust enterprise resource planning (ERP) software system should be well-suited to managing such material and production variability as well accounting for raw materials and finished goods in the manufacturing process. ERP is the application in discrete manufacturing that helps make production jobs highly predictable and repeatable.

The primary reason for this is that discrete manufacturing, especially in sub-assembly and continuous assembly production, often has a low degree of product variability. This is not to say that there is a low degree of product pricing variability, for product pricing is still an imprecise science that could use more research. It is rather the notion that real-time accounting for all material and operational costs in the manufacturing process is vital to informing other factors that create the greatest challenges to overcome in production management.

Without accurate and up-to-date shop floor, material, labor, and shipping data, manufacturers cannot really make informed decisions on the key business issues that impact (directly or indirectly) their operation. As well, in the absence of being able to link finished products to considerations such as inventory maintenance, customer volume discounts, incentives, and quality, a manufacturer would be hard-pressed to determine product profitability.

This is where the ERP application helps in providing accountability. Sophisticated ERP applications that are fully integrated into the production system will capture, assign, and compare actual and standard costs for all finished goods. A true ERP system will, in this regard, be a leaning function that also account for waste. Overall, through capturing and analyzing actual versus estimate, and actual versus standard, costs for products can be measured with less variability, and much more accuracy.

Of course, when dealing with innumerable raw materials, and the innumerable sources of such raw materials, variability will always be a concern of manufacturers. If variability must be a part of the manufacturing process, then it stands to reason that a higher degree of variability will affect a broader number of functions in an ERP system and therefore will require deeper support capabilities within the software.

http://globalshopsolutions.com/

Dusty Alexander is the President of Global Shop Solutions. Global Shop Solutions is the largest privately held ERP software company in the United States

Copyright 2008 - Global Shop Solutions. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Reprint Rights: You may reprint this article as long as you leave all of the links active, do not edit the article in any way, and give the author name credit

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Dusty_Alexander

By Dusty Alexander Platinum Quality Author

Rabu, 18 Maret 2009

Business Management Supply Chain - Product Kits, an ERP Solution to the Automotive Grey Market

Introduction

An increasing threat to the automotive industry over the past decade has been the growth in the use of non-genuine parts, known as the grey market. The grey market is the third party market in non-genuine parts, clones of the original manufactured components. Distributors deal with the grey market problem and its growth by trying to find ways of providing incentives to use genuine parts. Many have started to use kits which link together key components to provide a complete solution. These kits offer considerable financial, logistical and quality incentives, as well as improved warranties, to dealers and their customers and so remove the need to look to the grey market for replacement parts. This market is growing rapidly, especially within Asia, and includes counterfeit parts, as well as parts that are not intended to be counterfeit but are simply cheaper replacement parts. ERP software solutions, particularly the supply chain software, inventory correctly managed and configured must be capable of

For the customer, the use of non-genuine parts carries considerable financial risk. Grey market parts are almost universally inferior in quality to genuine parts and although cheaper initially, have to be replaced at more frequent intervals. They usually offer very limited warranty and, as these are individual components, each must carry its own warranty whereas a kit of genuine parts provides a more comprehensive warranty from the manufacturer. Another consideration is that the use of non-genuine parts potentially places all warranty at risk. Many distributors issue warranties under the condition that only genuine or approved parts are used.

In addition, the use of non-genuine parts can potentially affect the life span, or quality of a genuine part, particularly in the case where a non-genuine part is a component of multiple parts. If that non-genuine part endures greater and more rapid wear and tear, the rest of the components will suffer similarly. It requires more service, so in the short term, the cost is lower but in the long term, it actually may be a lot higher. A good example of that are components that endure a lot of wear and tear such as brake pads. Brake pads are a common item and non-genuine pads are known to wear at a greater rate, and therefore need to be replaced much more frequently.

The negative effects of the grey market on the manufacturer and distributor are many and varied. For example, a grey market brake pad may last one quarter as long as a genuine pad, and if the owner is unaware that the replacement is not a genuine part, blame may well be attributed to the manufacturer. For the distributor, the grey market cuts into market share. A major point of contention is when qualified service points use non-genuine parts. A vehicle owner may naturally expect that a qualified service point will provide genuine parts replacement. In fact, many distributors believe that their competition is not so much fellow distributors, but the market in grey spares.

Re-conditioned parts are another problem. It may not be well known amongst vehicle owners, but parts are sometimes removed from damaged or written-off vehicles. Instead of using new genuine parts, re-conditioned parts can be used. The longevity of that part is, therefore, not known, however a vehicle owner will expect that a genuine service will provide genuine parts. Although this is not yet prevalent in Australia due to the cost of importing grey parts, it can be the case in Asia as parts fail earlier than expected, leading to customer dissatisfaction and low regard for customer service. And as the cost of these items decreases and the quality improves, the distributor will find it even more difficult to compete. Kitting therefore becomes an integral and critical competitive strategy to counter the grey market.

Kits

There are two types of kits: Build Kits and Bill of Material (BOM) Kits. A Build Kit is one in which individual parts are pre-assembled before they are ordered and made available as a packaged unit. This type of kit is traditionally developed around a selection of dependent parts that are constantly used. An example in the automotive industry would be a 20,000km service kit, consisting of the relevant parts which are packaged ready for the service centre to use. It eliminates the requirement to determine and then search for individual components to complete the service. A single part number represents multiple parts.

A Build Kit provides an easy ordering process and eliminates the potential errors which are sometimes introduced when ordering individual parts. Furthermore, service centres may not have all of the required parts to perform a service or to replace faulty components. A Build Kit solves this problem.

A BOM Kit is used in situations where a single part number represents many smaller components. In simple terms, this kit expands into all the individual components and is picked and packaged at the time of order. For example, rather than ordering components individually, a single part number would enable all component parts to be ordered at once, eliminating errors and ensuring an easier, more comprehensive, higher quality ordering process.

Benefits of Kitting and Incentives

To solve the problem of non-genuine parts in the heavy vehicle industry many distributors have service kits for every level of service up to 100,000km. It is simple to find the kit for the model, for the service and order accordingly. Rather than have multiple line items in a purchase order, a single line item is sent to the warehouse that is then packaged and sent. A kit gives the dealer confidence that all components required for a particular job are present. In addition to Service Kits, the truck industry has developed the concept of Smash Kits - front-end, rear-end and specific panels Smash Kits. For example, a front-end kit would normally require two headlights, a grille, radiator, hoses and associated parts. This could be an excellent opportunity for BOM Kits. A dealer can simply type the kit required for the particular model, and then pick which components are required

The trucking companies are often the litmus test. Trends are identified, and because the trucking industry is very competitive, opportunities to provide a customer service or cost advantage are extremely important. However, the automotive passenger vehicle industry is now starting to follow the truck industry in using kits.

Some incentives are being offered, for example, a kit provides a financial incentive as opposed to purchasing individual parts. These incentives vary but, for example, a particular service kit may cost $1,000 if each component is purchased individually, but $750 if purchased in kit form. Additionally, if a single component price is reduced in the marketplace, the overall kit price may still be able to balance the overall cost of the kit, thereby maintaining good profit margins.

There is also a positive effect on quality, and on supply and service times. The service dealer can be assured that all the correct parts are available for the service and that he will not have to search for or re-order forgotten components. Instead of keying the 20 or so components for a particular service, a single key is used that incorporates all of the required components. The kit is then handed to the mechanic who has all that is required to provide that service. Quality is maintained because the parts are genuine and carry appropriate warranties. These benefits provide the dealer's customer with a guaranteed level of service, ongoing support, and an increased level of satisfaction. Ultimately this may well lead to repeat and referral business for the dealer. The true incentive for the distributor is in limiting the need to go beyond the available stock and access the grey market.

Forecasting and logistics

Kitting also assists in many aspects of the supply chain, particularly inventory management systems and warehouse management. Once a kit has been assembled and the trend for that type of kit has been analysed correctly, it becomes much easier to determine inventory turnover during a defined period. Business management supply chain software can have an automatic replenishment process once a kit level has fallen below a predetermined stock arrangement.

Kits do, however, require some initial adjustment to forecasting practice. For example, if 50 kits are built, quite often it is incorrectly recorded that 50 items have been moved. However, often there is only a requirement to record demand, particularly the demand on individual components that make up a kit. In the early stages of building kits, demand for each component is critical until the appropriate forecast can be determined. Once the correct balance of the number of kits required has been established the stock arrangements can be easily dealt with. One of the dangers of kits, of course, is that there is no point in building 100 kits if only ten are being turned over monthly. With correct forecasting, it is easier to build kits a month in advance, instead of perhaps 12 months and having considerable stock sitting on shelves with a perception of low turnover.

There is no doubt that kits also provide a better level of business intelligence. Many distributors have noticed some dealers increasing their purchasing based on kits and so they can also then forecast more accurately. Without kits, the ability to maintain stock levels can be difficult as there may not be true visibility as to the use of the individual components. Trends are easier to analyse for each dealer, based on a prediction of when the next service will be due. For example, it becomes possible to predict that vehicles that have just had a 20,000km service will probably require a 30,000km service and the appropriate number of kits at a defined future time. Stock levels can then be maintained and more accurate forecasting is possible. For the distributor benefit is gained through forecasting kits, as well as the individual components that make up those kits.

Many distributors use outside logistics companies, and kits provide a much simpler process for logistics because of the way they account for handling and inventory. A common accounting process is to pay per line item. As a kit will represent a single line item, but include considerably more components, the cost of logistics can be reduced. For example, if a kit consists of three line items, payment will be made on a single line as opposed to three lines, resulting in considerable logistics savings.

Summary

With the growth and availability of third party spares components, suppliers and distributors are looking to creative ways to maintain market share as well as ensure that the quality of spare parts in the automotive market place is not diluted. Spares kits are a practical solution to this threat. Dealers can easily order kits relative to the work to be performed and be assured that all components are in place at a price that is attractive and significantly reduced from individual parts ordering. Suppliers can be assured that genuine parts are being used, so too customers whose satisfaction is guaranteed. Kits enable business intelligence to be increased with a more predictable and consistent spare parts forecasting process and inventory requirements can be minimised and based on real knowledge of customer behaviour. Kits together with your ERP software solution can enable the supply chain itself to be streamlined to meet dealer delivery expectations.

IBS Australia develops ERP solutions and business management supply chain software for inventory management systems, manufacturing ERP software, business intelligence systems and integration ERP software. The fully integrated IBS ERP system includes collaborative sales, procurement, customer service, order management, demand-driven manufacturing, inventory management, business performance measurement and financial control

http://www.ibs.net/au/solutions/erp-software.jsp
http://www.ibs.net/au/solutions/supply-chain-management

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ben_Portelli

By Ben Portelli

Minggu, 01 Maret 2009

Maximizing Your ROI Through Optimal ERP Performance - Key 3 - Selecting Your ERP Solution

By Peter T Clarke

Once you've made your decision as to why you are considering an ERP implementation (covered in article #1 in this series) and investigated the total cost of ownership (article #2), there are several aspects you should consider in detail when selecting a specific system for your situation.

The seven most important of these are Functional compatibility with current and future business requirements

  • Total cost of ownership
  • Operational Metrics
  • Flexibility
  • Time and ease of implementation
  • Vendor support and relationships
  • Industry expertise and customer references

A survey by the Aberdeen Group (June 2007) found when it asked respondents what criteria were most important in selecting an ERP vendor, "remarkably little variation was visible across company size ... functionality is the clear top priority for all companies, followed by total cost of ownership".

1. Functional compatibility The first question you need to ask is: what applications can accommodate your business needs? As Christina Soh and Siew Kien Sia point out (MIS Quarterly, 2005), vendors create enterprise systems based around a number of common structures - "ES packages are not custom-built for each implementing organisation". "Vendors must make many assumptions about organisational requirements in such areas as organisational policies, structures, standard operating procedures, user knowledge, and interfaces. These assumptions manifest themselves in the processes and features in the ES package", which the authors refer to as 'package-embedded structures'. "ES vendors claim that their package-embedded structures reflect best practice, However, many customers have found that these configuration options do not meet all their specific needs, and many question whether the 'best practices' truly do apply to all organisations. "Developers' context - that is, their reference organisations - may differ from potential implementers' contexts, particularly those located in different countries or industries. Even within the same country and industry, contextual differences can exist".

The system should be able to provide functionality for all of your current and future business processes. To ascertain that this is the case, you first need to define and prioritise your company's processes, identifying the core business functions and developing a comprehensive requirements list based on input from all stakeholders. This means that, as Soh et al recommend, "implementing organisations identify, as early as possible, misfits between the package and their organisation. They should create a basis for ascertaining when to align through organisational adaptation and when to align through package customisation". 'Misfits', missing critical features or unsupported business processes, could be the elements that transform an otherwise great fit into a complete mismatch. Very often, these only surface upon implementation. Buyers should be very wary of future promises from software vendors. If the system does not have the necessary functionality right now in the current release, then you should discount any claims of functionality being available in the future. The Aberdeen survey warns that, while functionality may be the top selection criterion, "ERP is often considered a commodity today. Don't assume the functionality you need is available. Take a 'show me' attitude in demonstration." One who has documented this 'road test' guide to assess the suitability of a specific solution is Esref Akpinar (2005), who describes a software selection process for a liner shipping company using fuzzy logic decision making. This entailed five scripted scenarios to understand how software packages would handle specific key operational situations. A demonstration evaluation document was prepared, with every question in the document given a weighting according to their importance. An evaluation table was prepared of the results of the demonstrations which clearly indicated which product best fitted the company's operations and requirements.

2. Total cost of ownership Prospective buyers should ensure they fully understand the true cost of ownership beyond the initial software licence fees and hardware cost. These may include costs such as those for integration, interfaces, systems communications , extra staff required, upgrades and helpline support. This topic is so important that it has been covered in great detail by the second article in this series, "Managing The Total Cost Of Ownership - What You Need To Know".

3. Operational Metrics It is imperative to ensure that not only the costs, but also the benefits of an ERP system are controlled and measured during the implementation project. The benefits generally come in the form of cost savings and operational improvements (e.g. lead time reduction). Cost savings should be built into budgets and operation measures progressively tracked.Legacy systems often do not support the operational metrics and these have to be assessed manually. A key selection criterion for the new system is thus also the ability to support these operational metrics.

4. Flexibility Can the application be modified and scaled according to the changing needs of a dynamic and growing business?Look for an ERP solution that will accommodate new operating protocols, future business growth, market expansion and any other initiatives that might arise.Things to consider when evaluating flexibility:

  • System parameters and default settings;
  • Customer screen and menu options;
  • Tools for modifying standard forms;
  • Data access options and custom reporting; and modular format.

5. Time and ease of implementation

Key questions you should ask regarding the implementation process itself include:

  • How long will it take to implement the ERP system?
  • Will it cause any major disruptions to your normal business operations?
  • Is there an implementation control process (ICP) in place to manage this?
  • What sort of business process re-engineering will be required in order to implement the system?
  • How long will it take to train staff to use the system?

6. Vendor support and relationships Your software vendor decision is one that, hopefully, continues well beyond the normal, five-year decision cycle. To that end, three questions are important:

  • Does the vendor have a sustainable presence backed up by experience in your industry and a proven track record on installations to similar sized organisations as your own?
  • Will you and your management team have a comfortable working relationship that extends to their knowing you and your business intimately? Do they show a sense of responsibility and accountability for making your system choice a success?
  • Do you have 'one throat to choke'? In the event that issues need to be resolved, do you have a direct executive contact who is accountable for making sure your customer service experience is consistently at the highest level?
  • How many total vendors will you deal with on your ERP package? Sustaining multiple vendors is cumbersome.

7. Industry expertise and customer references Key questions that will determine the reliability of the vendor include:

  • Does the vendor have a proven track record in your specific industry?
  • Can the vendor point to a number of companies in your industry who are already using the software and who will confirm that they made a sound decision.

One issue that cuts across many of these selection criteria is the issue of customisation of the software, so it is worth briefly flagging the topic in this context. As Aberdeen Group points out (July 2007), only 11 per cent of respondents to one of its surveys got away with zero customisation. According to Soh et al, the simplest form of implementation - so-called 'vanilla' implementation - requires the organisation to bend to accommodate the software package. "Vanilla promotes organisational adaptation, either by conscious redesign and substantial change management, or by piecemeal, evolutionary workarounds, such as individuals and groups adapting. Their adapted practices lead to new organisational structures. Package software modification can range from customising the package code to interfacing with custom-developed modules or modules from other vendors." "Users tend to push for package modification to minimise the amount of change they will have to make. Consultants and project managers tend to advocate organisational adaptation, to simplify package implementation and avoid the tangible costs (time, resources and risks) of package modification." The playoff between these two apparently conflicting viewpoints can be a key ingredient to the success of the ERP project, particularly the total cost of ownership, and should therefore be a prime consideration among your selection criteria.

References:

  • Akpinar, E., "Software selection for a liner shipping company using fuzzy logic decision making", paper submitted to the Institute for Graduate Studies in Science & Engineering, Systems and Control Engineering, Bogazici University, 2005
  • IBS, "6 Essential considerations when selecting an ERP system", IBS Australia, February 2008
  • Jutras, C., and Dalle Tezze, H., "When relacing ERP - Size matters", Aberdeen Group, June 2007
  • Jutras, C., Trost, J., and Dalle Tezze, H., "Taking the ERP plunge for the first time", July 2007
  • Soh, C., and Siew Kien Sia, "The challenges of implementing 'vanilla' versions of enterprise software", MIS Quarterly Executive, September 2005

Peter Clarke is the Chief Technology Officer, IBS Asia-Pacific. IBS develops ERP solutions and business management supply chain software for inventory management systems, manufacturing ERP software, business intelligence systems and integration ERP software. The IBS ERP system is fully integrated and includes collaborative sales, procurement, customer service, order management, demand-driven manufacturing, inventory management, business performance measurement and financial control.

http://supplychainsecrets.com.au/gartner
http://www.ibs.net/au/solutions/erp-software.jsp